Week of Water
Research has shown that one of the main reasons I drink coffee, it helps to concentrate or makes you more alert, is actually not true. The research can be found here: http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/npp201071a.html and some good analysis here: http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2023 . Basically its not because caffeine isn't an active pharmacological agent, because it is, its that you get used to the effect quite fast and then the caffeine just gets you back up to your baseline (which habitual use has lowered). Now you could still argue that you can control when you are alert by drinking caffeine to get back to your baseline at your choosing instead of when your body-chemistry, sleep-cycle and other factors allow you to be alert but that's not really the same thing, is it?
So as I try to live a rational life and make decisions based on science and reason I am currently typing this while my body is trying to cope without morning coffee. I'm also posting this because research also shows, surprise surprise, that people will hold a public promise more often than a private personal one. That said, after kicking the habit I will probably drink small amounts of coffee when necessary because coffee-drinking when not habitual also works, and is a social thing too. Oh, and I would be amiss to not admit that my friend Jonatan ( http://twitter.com/zch ) was way ahead of me about this when he quit coffee almost exactly a year ago, which I teased him about. Sorry :)
Last week while I was merrily tapping away at my keyboard at work I noticed that my phone (a Nokia N900) felt warm in my pocket. This happens every now and then, I leave an app on and it ends up doing something heavy or a webpage with flash is open. No biggie, I'll just turn stuff off and continue working. The problem was that I had no apps running. Since the N900 runs a full Linux installation, daemons and background apps can sometimes run amok. Being a command-line Linux-guy I looked deeper into my computer-slash-phone and found out that a computer with a Mexican IP-address was running a dictionary attack on SSH (over 3G), trying to break into my phone.
Now, I should point out that first of all I was running an up to date OpenSSH-version (which isn't installed or actived by default for those worrying) and I had a strong password, so I wasn't running a risk of being compromised. But my battery-life wasn't improving either. I shut down OpenSSH* and the next time I need it I'll bind it to WLAN-only, but the question remains: Are our phones becoming too much like computers?I, for one, like carrying a full Linux-system in my pocket, but it might require a little too much expertise for most people. The complexity is hidden away in most smartphone OSes, but that doesn't mean it isn't lurking there, in the background. Waiting to be exploited by hackers, virus-writers and other assorted nefarious characters. Be safe and think about what you install on your phone!
*) Turning off SSH in Maemo is a bit tricky - Maemo uses "upstart" for daemons but still keeps the old rc.d-system also, which can be a little bewildering (it was to me). What you need to do is go into "/etc/event.d/sshd" with a text-editor and comment the first line (with #). Then you write "initctl stop sshd" and sshd will be stopped and not restarted automatically.
Apple Inc. is now collecting the "precise," "real-time geographic location" of its users' iPhones, iPads and computers.
In an updated version of its privacy policy, the company added a paragraph noting that once users agree, Apple and unspecified "partners and licensees" may collect and store user location data.
When users attempt to download apps or media from the iTunes store, they are prompted to agree to the new terms and conditions. Until they agree, they cannot download anything through the store.
The company says the data is anonymous and does not personally identify users. Analysts have shown, however, that large, specific data sets can be used to identify people based on behavior patterns.
I don't mean to sound paranoid but privacy-issues should be discussed and not hidden in a opaque privacy policy. The problem with this kind of functionality is that even if its used properly by Apple, there can be legal pressure applied on them to release the data - or it could be stolen. I'd rather not have this functionality and data so readily available.
It should be noted, and is in the end of the article, that Google does more or less the same with their Android-phones as well.
Update: Other blog and news sources make the point that Apple keeps the data anonymized and that this type of policy and wording is needed for apps like Google Maps and Foursquare to work. Anonymizing efficiently is surprisingly hard given enough data - if you track my daily life any wannabe-detective could figure out who I am. Other experiments such as AOL releasing search data and Netflix releasing movie-watching data shows that you can analyze the data to break anonymity.
Then again, if you trust the Steve, he has a reasonable take on location-privacy:
We worry a lot about location in phones," Jobs said. "We have rejected a lot of apps that want to take your personal data and suck it up into the cloud. A lot of people in the Valley think we are really old-fashioned about that, and maybe we are. Privacy means people know what they are signing up for in plain English...Some people want to share more data. Ask them. Ask them every time. Let them know precisely what you are going to do with their data."
From this years D: All Things Digital Conference, via news.cnet.com
Apple is pushing computer users as fast as it can toward a centrally controlled computing ecosystem where it makes all the decisions about what native applications may be used on the devices it sells -- and takes a cut of every dollar that is spent inside that ecosystem. This is a direct repudiation of its own history, and more broadly that of the larger personal-computing ecosystem, where no one can stop anyone else from writing and distributing software that other people might want to use.
Steve Jobs says Apple is a curator, nothing more. This grossly understates the control. Jobs says Apple has "made mistakes" in being the police, judge, jury and executioner in its Disney-style world, and is working hard to perfect the system.
But this is a disconnect with reality. Central control, no matter how well-intentioned, is itself the problem, not the solution. The "enlightened dictator" is fiction. And dangerous.
I realize that I won't persuade the many people who prefer to live in gated communities, believing they can leave any time they wish. But switching costs will only get higher over time for those who choose to live in the Apple ecosystem.
Dan Gillmor is saying what I have been thinking for a while, and why I bought the HP Mini 210 netbook. It's so that I can reacquaint myself with Linux on the Desktop and see if it could be an alternative (again).
A very interesting video from 2009 of Ed Catmull, one of the founders of Pixar, showed up in my twitter-feed this morning; its called “Keep Your Crises Small”:
It’s almost an hour long and was filmed at Stanford Graduate School of Business so it's mostly from a management and business perspective about the challenges that Pixar has had even though it has been successful. I spent a few years being pretty interesting in a lot of management and business stuff and read a lot about it; enough to become a little cynical I guess — management theory has some truth to it but there are lots of gurus who don’t really know very much in the end. This presentation is far from some management consultant guru and is packed with interesting and useful knowledge. Ed seems like a very pragmatic manager and he cuts through a lot of bullshit. I’d like to think its because of his technical background but I might be biased there :).Anyway, watch that if you have any interest in either background information about Pixar or practical management stuff, albeit on a a pretty high level.
Some of my notes:
I don't do New Years resolutions because they hardly ever work and if they are good ideas you should start these projects when you get the idea and are in the mood. That said, if I made a resolution it would be to read less news and more facts this year. I actually began this project last year.
I used to have this link in my browser that opened up a massive list of different news-sites, based on the theory that if I read the news from enough sources I'd filter out some kind of objective truth about what is happening in the world. Of course this isn't what happens, most news comes from the same source anyway - the news site is just an aggregator nowadays so you should choose the one you feel will point out the news that is important to you. News are also sensational in nature so even if you know what events have occurred you won't get the whole story and no one bothers to get back to you if they are wrong or new information comes up. Last summer, after a friend of mine extolled the virtues of "The Economist" I bought a couple of issues from the newsstand and took the time to read each issue, realizing that this was the kind of news I wanted. I wanted intelligent and non-sensational reporting about important issues but also with analysis and background. I'm now a subscriber and read every issue with care - usually it takes most of the week. That doesn't matter because the news is old anyway, the news has been chosen to be relevant even 1-2 weeks later and comes with the aforementioned analysis and background it needs. I still want to know if something important has happened, and because of this I still read a few sites every day. I go the Helsingin Sanomat ( http://www.hs.fi ) which is our countries largest newspaper, they have a great website and good reporting. There I get finnish news and some of the most important international ones. I also skim either New York Times' website ( http://global.nytimes.com ) and/or the BBC News page ( http://news.bbc.co.uk ) for more international news. Last I go to TechMeme ( http://www.techmeme.com ) which collects the latest rumors and information in the tech and Internet-industry - mostly because that is one of my fields of interest. That's a lot less than the nine (9!) sites that I used to skim/peruse before (BBC, HBL, Google News, NYT, Techmeme, Yle, HS, Der Spiegel and Reddit). I read the news sites by skimming instead of actually reading very many articles. Yes, I am a recovering procrastinator and information addict... I have a few additional news flows too, I follow several twitter-feeds for both breaking news and news that become old faster or isn't important if I'm busy. I'm trying to cut down on those too because it's too easy to procrastinate and find some weird little tidbit fascinating when you should be doing something more important. Like study, or clean up your desk - like I had planned to today...